Schizoanalysis as Metamodeling
which is related to the idea of "flows", potentiality and actuality in cycle, something like this:

or in my interpreation in Finnish:

ok, maybe this would need some deeper interpreation ... :)
Autonomy, Interactivity, Automatism


I have made those notes very quickly, please edit those that concern you!
Karolina: organicity - sulf supporting system for its life time, organisation, metabolism. working with idea of lapus as a social pimple, place of autonomy
Kari's alternative university; unemployed artists, cooperation with city nonhierarchical, institution 5 year plan, beginning
tero: visual artist performance, audio, field recording, groups, autonimic organisational issues, teaching drawing, mollecular organisation,
Jacek: Denmark, Stockholm, experience design, art etchnology and design, not considering graphic or product designer indisciplinary being, looking for metaphor for beings , varuous experience, sound design, movie....
Marko: music background, music theory, theater, synthesis now trying to make, games: game freak, brainwave muslic laboratory project, interactive performance installation, brainwave of the audience exchange to the, music, performers that react to the musik,
Cat: dance background improvisation: journalism study not for me, climbing in the same time, dance improvisation, from there to dance, technical classes, photography ba in dance and visual art, technology, performer and choreographer, sculpturing choreography and video artist, multimedia dance performance, new media and performance, teacher, improvisation and performance, dance for camera.
Helen: artist and researches on interdc practices, cybernetics, system based art drawin colective utterance, accident, overheating ssytem , theree dimentional level of writing code, low tech investigations. , writes, teacher dartington college,
performance video installation,
What is Automatism:
1748, first used by Eng. physician and philosopher David Hartley (1705-57) in ref. to involuntary animal or human actions, from Gk. automatos "self-acting," from autos- "self" (comb. form) + matos "thinking, animated." Sense of "self-acting, having power of motion" is from 1812; especially of machinery, which simulates human action from 1940.
1. self-thinking, self-acting; System of subsystems, in which coordination is simplified in order to system being more productive or to function at all (as washing machine for example).
2. Being a machine.
3. Immediate answer coming from some existing code of behavior.
4. Way of dealing with things in an automatic mode.
What is Autonomy:
1623, from Gk. autonomia, noun of quality from autonomos "independent, living by one's own laws," from auto- "self" (comb. form) + nomos "custom, law" (see numismatics).Autonomous is recorded from 1800
1. Self-organizing inside the existing system;
2. System of subsystems cooperating separately and without coordination.
(that is description from myself and Dictionary and Thesaurus, New Oxford American Dictionary, 2nd Edition, Oxford American Writers Thesaurus, Copyright © 2005 Apple Computer, Inc.,)
I think what is interesting about this definition point of view: they are both almost like a similar systems, but with total different, how to say, governing system. Automatic system is set of smaller units governed from outside (by brain:) and interacting between each other functionally in order to work in most productive way, and autonomic system is a set of smaller units that are each on their own and having separate own functions and interacting between each other in self-governing mode, so how I thin: not limited by the necessity of certain outcome, or by the way how to approach it.
k.
Autonomy, Interactivity, Automatism – three tricky concepts. How to deal with them?
We suggest the following:
Let’s start by looking at them as couples. Interactivity – Autonomy. Interactivity – Automatism. Autonomy – Automatism.
How are they connected?
autonomy in interactivity?
interactive autonomy?
automatic interactivity?
interactive automat?
autonomic automatism?
automatic autonomy?
And also everything that is in between.
How do these pairs support or disturb each other? What kind of systems can we find or build (or destroy) on them?
After considering those questions, it might get easier to find some common ground for all of us to work with all three concepts.
We are also open to different suggestions.
How are we going to proceed with the workshop?
We would like to organize it as peer to peer cooperation based on propositions and contributions coming from each participant. In our opinion this would make possible reaching each of our subject in practice. We will send more detailed information about the way of participating later to everyone who would be directly interested in taking part in AIA workshop.
“We” means: Marko Alastalo and Karolina Kucia.
Marko is working on interactive brainwave music, and Karolina is working with idea of autonomy, lapsus and reanimation in self-organized actions in public space.
Contact us: marko.alastalo(at)teak.fi, karolina.kucia(at)teak.fi.
Greetings and Welcome! Marko and Karolina
PS: You are welcome with the questions you are dealing with in your projects or with some new made for this lab propositions. They don’t have to be long, or extended. Its purpose is seeding, others getting knowledge on some particular aspects that you are interested and communicating with others seeds.